Published: · Author:
Related to Insurance
Disclosure. I am a licensed Financial Security Advisor, Mutual Fund Representative, and Group Insurance & Annuity Plans Advisor. I am not a lawyer, tax lawyer, or accountant. I discuss taxes only as they relate to specific insurance, investment, and estate strategies; I do not provide general tax optimization or comprehensive financial planning. Content is educational only. Mutual funds offered through WhiteHaven Securities Inc. Insurance products offered through iAssure Inc. Coordinate decisions with your CPA, notary, or lawyer. See Disclaimer and Privacy.
Visual Summary

$3 Million in Your Corporation. Universal Life vs Taxable Portfolio.

A 47-year-old business owner deposits $300,000 per year for 10 years - $3 million total - into his holding company. Two paths for that capital. Universal life with investment control, or taxable portfolio. Very different outcomes for the family.

Universal Life & Corporate Tax

Visual Summary Full Explainer →

Important: Insurance & Segregated Funds (Not Mutual Funds)

This case study discusses investments within a universal life insurance policy. These investments are segregated funds (or similar investment options inside the policy), regulated under the Insurance Act. This case study does not discuss or compare mutual funds offered through WhiteHaven Securities Inc.

Read the Full Explainer: How Universal Life Insurance Works →

The Setup

A 47-year-old incorporated business owner in Quebec has substantial active business income and retained earnings. He directs $300,000 per year for 10 years into his holding company - $3 million total. He wants investment control: the ability to choose specific funds inside the policy. After year 10, deposits stop. The policy continues to grow on its own.

Two ways to deploy this capital. Same person. Same corporation. Same dollars.

The Profile
Age at start47
Annual deposit (years 1-10)$300,000
Total deposited$3,000,000
After year 10No further deposits
ProvinceQuebec (MTR 53%)
UL illustrated growth5% net (after management and UL fees)

Two Paths for the Same Capital

Path A: Balanced Portfolio (Taxable)
Expected return6%/yr
Tax on annual growth~50%
Passive income reportedYes
SBD grind-downYes
Tax on extraction at death40% - 53%
Ongoing managementRequired
Path B: Universal Life
Investment controlYou choose funds
Tax on annual growth0%
Passive income reportedNo
SBD impactNone
Death benefit via CDATax-free
Ongoing managementRequired

Universal Life vs Whole Life: Why This Case Study?

Universal life offers investment control: you select the funds inside the contract. Whole life does not. If you want to manage allocations, rebalance, or choose specific ETFs, universal life is the structure. The trade-off: you bear investment risk. Values can decline in a down market. This illustration assumes 5% net growth (after management and UL fees).

See the Whole Life comparison for the insurer-managed alternative.

What the Illustrated Values Look Like

Based on a universal life policy illustration with 5% net growth assumption. Values are non-guaranteed and depend on investment performance. Actual results will be higher or lower. Universal life carries market risk.

AgeYearTotal DepositedFund ValueDeath BenefitNet to Family (UL insurance)Net to Family (Taxable portfolio)
481$300,000$299,201$5,799,201$5,674,767$185,679
525$1,500,000$1,645,012$7,145,012$6,528,862$1,055,826
5710$3,000,000$3,740,165$9,240,165$8,026,540$2,475,230
5811$3,000,000$3,917,836$9,417,836$8,214,054$2,624,416
6215$3,000,000$4,720,510$10,220,510$9,073,291$3,289,855
6720$3,000,000$5,966,642$11,466,642$10,444,349$4,300,468
7225$3,000,000$7,463,732$12,963,732$12,159,264$5,554,223
7730$3,000,000$9,178,258$14,678,258$14,252,100$7,109,614
8538$3,000,000$12,037,071$17,537,071$17,537,071$10,413,198

"Net to Family" = after-tax amount retained by shareholders. UL assumes 5% net growth (after management and UL fees). Taxable portfolio assumes 6% return (illustration rate + 1%) split across interest (30%), dividends (20%), realized capital gains (30%), deferred capital gains (20%). Corporate tax 42%, shareholder dividend tax 42%.

Year 10 - Deposits Complete
$8.0M vs $2.5M
$3 million deposited. The universal life path delivers $8.03 million net to the family. The taxable portfolio path: $2.48 million. Same capital, same time period - a $5.55 million difference.
Year 25 - Age 72
$12.2M vs $5.6M
No additional deposits since year 10. Fund value has grown to $7.46 million. Death benefit: $12.96 million. Net to the family: $12.16 million through the universal life path versus $5.55 million through the taxable path.

The Hidden Cost of Path A

The tax on investment returns is only the beginning. A $3 million taxable portfolio earning 6% generates $180,000 in annual passive income. That triggers the full SBD grind-down.

Passive income
$180K+
SBD grind-down
$500K lost
Extra tax on OpCo
~$71,500/yr

Your operating company's tax rate jumps from the small business rate to the general corporate rate - not because it earned more, but because your investment portfolio generated passive income. The universal life policy generates no passive income. The SBD stays intact.

Note: Assumes no other significant passive income. If the corporation already has passive income that eliminates the SBD, this additional cost would not apply.

Age 65
$878,000
Cumulative extra tax on operating income
Age 75
$1,593,000
Cumulative extra tax on operating income
Age 85
$2,308,000
Cumulative extra tax on operating income
The Cost the Illustration Doesn't Show
$2.3M
By age 85, the taxable portfolio path has cost the corporation an additional $2.3 million in tax on its operating income - money that has nothing to do with the investment returns themselves. The universal life path incurs zero SBD grind-down.

At Death: How Much Reaches the Family?

Path A - Taxable Portfolio
40% - 53%
Combined extraction tax. Deemed disposition at corporate level, then personal tax on dividends to the estate.
Path B - Universal Life via CDA
~0%
Death benefit flows to the corporation tax-free. CDA credit allows tax-free capital dividends to the family.
If Death Occurs at Age 85
$17.5M vs $10.4M
Net to beneficiaries: $17,537,071 through the universal life path (death benefit flows via CDA, tax-free). $10,413,198 through the taxable portfolio path (after extraction tax). Same $3 million deposited. A gap of $7.12 million if death occurs at 85.

At age 85, the illustrated death benefit is $17.54 million - all flowing through the CDA to the family, tax-free. The same $3 million in a taxable corporate portfolio at 6% delivers $10.41 million net to the family after all taxes. That's a gap of $7.12 million on the same capital - before adding the SBD grind-down impact on operating income.

Universal Life: Costs and Risks to Consider

Premium tax
3.3% (QC) or 2% (ON) on every deposit. $99,000 lost to tax on $3M in Quebec before a dollar is invested.
Investment risk
You choose the funds. If markets drop, your account value drops. Whole life does not have this risk.
Cost structure
YRT cost rises over time. If growth doesn't keep pace, you may need to inject more capital to keep the policy in force.

Universal life makes sense when you want investment control and are comfortable managing the risk. Whole life makes sense when you want the insurer to bear the investment risk. Both shelter growth and transfer value through the CDA.

Next Step

How would your capital compare on both paths? A personalized universal life illustration shows net-to-family at key milestones based on your age, investment profile, and corporate structure.

Request a Personalized Illustration
Assumptions: Illustrative example based on a universal life policy for a 47-year-old male non-smoker in Quebec. Face amount $5,500,000, death benefit type Sum Insured plus Fund Value, cost of insurance Yearly Renewable Term. Annual deposits of $300,000 for 10 years ($3,000,000 total). No further deposits after year 10. Non-guaranteed values assume 5% net growth (after management and UL fees). Investment performance is not guaranteed. Universal life carries market risk. Alternative investment assumes 6% gross return split across interest (30%), dividends (20%), realized capital gains (30%), deferred capital gains (20%). Corporate tax 50%, shareholder dividend tax 45%. SBD grind-down: $5 reduction per $1 of passive income above $50,000. This is a concept illustration only and does not form part of an application for insurance. Actual results will vary. A personalized illustration is available upon request. Specific insurer names and product details are available upon request.

Resources

Tags

Case Study, Universal Life Insurance, Corporate Tax, Estate Strategies, Quebec, Ontario

Full Disclosure.

This content is for information and education only. It explains general concepts that may apply to incorporated business owners, but it is not personalized tax, legal, or investment advice.

Tax Considerations:

  • Tax rules are complex and subject to change
  • Strategies and benefits depend on your specific circumstances, province, and business structure
  • Always consult with a qualified CPA before implementing any tax strategy
  • Provincial variations in rates and rules may apply (Québec vs. Ontario differences exist)
  • Past tax treatment does not guarantee future treatment

Investment Risk Disclosure:

  • Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal
  • There is no guarantee that any investment strategy will achieve its objectives
  • Investment values fluctuate with market conditions, and you may receive less than you originally invested
  • Tax efficiency is one factor; risk, fees, and total returns all matter
  • Past performance does not guarantee future results

Insurance Illustrations:

  • Insurance illustrations show projected values based on assumptions that may not be guaranteed
  • Actual results will vary based on factors including interest rates, mortality experience, and expenses
  • Non-guaranteed elements (such as dividends or credited interest rates) are not promises of future performance
  • Review both guaranteed and non-guaranteed projections with your advisor before making decisions

Content Accuracy:

  • We strive to ensure information is accurate and current, but laws and regulations change frequently
  • Information reflects our understanding at the time of publication and may not reflect subsequent changes
  • If you believe any content contains an error, please contact us

Regulatory:

  • Mutual funds are offered through Valeurs Mobilières WhiteHaven Inc.
  • Insurance products and certain other services are provided through iAssure Inc., an independent firm in the insurance of persons and in the group insurance of persons
  • These activities are neither the business nor the responsibility of Valeurs Mobilières WhiteHaven Inc.

Professional Advice:

  • This article is not a substitute for professional advice from your CPA, lawyer, or financial advisor
  • Work with your professional team to understand how these concepts apply to your specific situation
  • For personalized advice, a formal engagement and suitability review are required

See Disclaimer and Privacy Policy for details.