Talk to Your Tax Lawyer Today
This case study involves complex tax and legal strategies that require coordination with your tax lawyer, CPA, and estate planning professionals. Do not implement these strategies without professional guidance.
I am not a tax lawyer or CPA. I bring up what counts so you can take action with the right professionals. For me, it's important: I cannot optimize portfolios and insurance if the right structure is not in place.
The Business Valuation Series
The Compounding Tax Bomb
How a business owner with growing investments and operations faces a $53-61M tax bill at death and how purification and estate freeze strategies can save ~$7.0M in estate taxes
Client Profile: Kevin
Background
Profile
Business owner, age 52
Time Horizon
33 years (to age 85)
Current Structure
Single corporation (OpCo + Investments)
Operating Company
Current EBITDA
$400,000
Growth Rate
15% annually for 10 years, then 3% (inflation/maintenance)
Current Value
~$3.6M (estimated, 9x EBITDA)
Investment Portfolio
Current Value
$1.2 Million
Growth Rate
10% annually (aggressive growth)
Tax Friction
50% of growth realized annually (taxed), 50% unrealized
Annual Injections
$200,000/year (after-tax profit)
The Challenge
The Problem
Investments growing faster than OpCo
LCGE Status
Will never qualify (purity test fails)
Tax Bill at Death
$53-61 Million (estimated)
The Hidden Leak: The "Purity" Problem
Kevin's corporation holds both his operating business and his investment portfolio in the same company. This creates a permanent problem.
Why This Matters: The Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption (LCGE)
The LCGE allows business owners to claim up to $1.25 million in tax-free capital gains when selling qualified small business corporation shares. But there's a catch: the company must pass the "purity test."
The purity test requires: At least 90% of the company's assets must be used in an active business. Investment portfolios count as "passive assets," not active business assets.
Kevin's Current Situation:
- Current investments: $1.2M vs OpCo value: ~$3.6M = 25% passive assets (fails purity test)
- Investments growing at 10% + $200k/year capital injections (50% of growth realized annually, 50% unrealized)
- OpCo growing at 15% for 10 years, then flat
- Result: Investments will grow faster than OpCo, making the purity problem worse over time
- Outcome: Kevin will never qualify for the LCGE in the current structure
The Compounding Effect
Because the investments are compounding at 10% and being fed by new OpCo profits, Kevin's HoldCo is turning into a massive "investment fund" that happens to own a business. The investments will grow faster than the OpCo, making the purity problem permanent.
The Multiplier: What Kevin Owns at Age 85
This is where the math gets scary. We need to see what the "pot of gold" looks like in 33 years.
OpCo Value (Commercial Goodwill)
At age 85
$28.7 Million
Grows 15% annually for 10 years (to age 62), then 3% (inflation/maintenance) for 23 years
How CRA Values This:
CRA typically values businesses using fair market value, determined through methods like earnings multiples. For high-growth industries with stable long-term earnings, multiples of 9x EBITDA are common. At age 85, with EBITDA of $3.193M (after 10 years of 15% growth followed by 23 years of 3% inflation), CRA would use a 9x multiple to determine the business value for tax purposes.
Stress Test:
While OpCo's sector is currently growing at 30%, we utilized 15% for this study. At a 30% growth rate, the tax liability at death would exceed $150M, effectively making the business unsellable for the next generation.
Investment Portfolio (The Monster)
At age 85
$47.9 Million
Breakdown:
- Portfolio value at age 85: $47.9M
- Adjusted cost basis: ~$7.8M (initial $1.2M free of gains + annual capital additions from $200k/year contributions and after-tax realized gains)
- Unrealized capital gains: ~$40.1M ($47.9M - $7.8M)
- Note: Current $1.2M portfolio has no gains. Annual $200k additions are capital (increase ACB). 50% of annual growth realized and taxed (paid from OpCo), 50% unrealized.
How CRA Values This:
Investment portfolios are valued at fair market value (current market prices). CRA will use the market value of all investments at the date of death to determine the capital gain subject to tax.
Total Estate Value
HoldCo shares at age 85
$76.6 Million
OpCo ($28.7M) + Investments ($47.9M)
The Problem is Permanent
At age 85, Kevin's corporation will be ~62.5% passive assets ($47.9M investments vs $28.7M OpCo). The investments grow faster than the OpCo, so the purity test will never be passed. The LCGE will be denied, and the entire $76.6M will be subject to capital gains tax at death.
The "Do Nothing" Tax Bill: Death at Age 85
If Kevin dies holding shares worth $76.6M without any planning, here's what happens:
Step 1: The Final Tax Return (Capital Gains)
LCGE: $0 (Denied. The company is ~62.5% passive assets. It fails the purity test completely.
Step 2: Double Tax (Extraction)
The estate has $76.6M in assets but owes the CRA ~$17.4M. If they liquidate to pay the family:
- Dividend Tax: The remaining funds come out as dividends
- Estimated Double Tax Load: Without planning, the combined tax rate (Death + Dividend) can hit 70-80%
- Potential Total Tax: ~$30 Million to $40 Million
This means Kevin's family could receive as little as $15.3M to $23.0M out of a $76.6M estate, a loss of $53.6-61.3M to taxes.
The Discovery: Purify, Freeze, and "Cap" the Damage
We implement the plan today at age 52, before the problem compounds further.
Step 1: Purification (Separate the Monster)
We move the $1.2M portfolio into a separate InvestCo.
Benefit:
The OpCo is now "clean." We can now claim the LCGE on the OpCo shares.
Step 2: The Estate Freeze (OpCo Only)
We freeze Kevin's OpCo shares at $3.6M.
Action:
- Kevin exchanges common shares for fixed Preferred Shares worth $3.6M
- New shares issued to a Family Trust
Benefit:
Future growth of the OpCo (from $3.6M to $28.7M) happens in the Trust, saving Kevin's estate from being taxed on that $25.1M growth.
LCGE Application (Critical Rule):
Important: You can only use your LCGE on shares that YOU own. Kevin's frozen shares ($3.6M) are owned by Kevin personally, so only Kevin's $1.25M LCGE applies to those shares. This leaves $2.35M taxable on Kevin's frozen shares.
Future Growth Protection:
The $25.1M future growth (from $3.6M to $28.7M) happens in the Family Trust. When the Trust sells these shares, it can allocate the gains to beneficiaries (spouse + 2 children), allowing them to use their $1.25M LCGE each ($3.75M total). Kevin's $1.25M LCGE is used on his frozen shares.
Step 3: Managing the Investment Portfolio
You cannot easily "freeze" a pure investment portfolio without paying tax now. However, by separating it into InvestCo:
- Stop the Grind: Ensure OpCo keeps its low tax rate (Small Business Deduction) by managing realized gains in InvestCo
- Refundable Tax Planning: InvestCo generates "Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand" (RDTOH). Pay dividends over time to recover roughly 30% of corporate tax paid
- Spousal Rollover: Leave InvestCo shares to a Spousal Trust, deferring that ~$10.7M tax bill until the second spouse dies
The Proof: The Numbers Compared
1. Immediate Savings (Kevin's LCGE): Purification unlocks Kevin's $1.25M LCGE on his frozen shares. Tax saved NOW: ~$333,000 ($1.25M × 50% × 53.3%). (Could be higher with future LCGE adjustments.)
2. Future Savings (Family's LCGE): The $25.1M future growth in the Family Trust can use the spouse's and children's LCGE ($3.75M total). Tax saved in FUTURE: ~$1.0M ($3.75M × 50% × 53.3%). (Could be higher with future LCGE adjustments.)
3. Tax Deferred (Estate Freeze): The remaining $21.35M taxable growth ($25.1M - $3.75M LCGE) results in ~$5.7M tax DEFERRED. This tax is paid when the Trust eventually sells, not at Kevin's death.
Total Benefit: ~$1.33M tax saved (Kevin's $333k + Family's $1.0M) + ~$5.7M tax deferred = ~$7.0M total benefit.
The Opportunity Cost: Why Waiting Costs Millions
Every year Kevin waits, the problem compounds. Here's why acting now matters:
The LCGE Loss
Without purification, Kevin loses access to $5 million in LCGE (Kevin's $1.25M + spouse's + 2 kids' $3.75M). This translates to ~$1.33M in permanent tax savings that would be donated to the CRA.
Cost of delay: ~$1.33M in permanent tax savings lost
The Estate Freeze Deferral
Without the freeze, the full $28.7M is taxed at Kevin's death (~$7.6M). With the freeze, only $3.6M is taxed at Kevin's death (~$0.6M), and the remaining ~$5.7M is deferred until the Trust sells.
Cost of delay: ~$5.7M tax paid NOW instead of deferred
Investment Compounding
The longer investments stay in the same corporation, the larger the portfolio becomes, and the more difficult purification becomes. The purity problem gets worse every year.
Cost of delay: Increasing complexity and tax risk
The Bottom Line
Time is the only asset that can't be bought back. Every year of delay costs Kevin's estate millions in future taxes. The strategies (purification and estate freeze) work best when implemented early, before the problem compounds further.
Key Takeaways
What this case study demonstrates
The Purity Problem is Permanent
When investments grow faster than the operating business, the company will never pass the LCGE purity test. The problem compounds over time, making it worse every year.
Purification Unlocks the LCGE
Separating investments from the OpCo unlocks $5M in LCGE: Kevin's $1.25M on his frozen shares (~$333k immediate tax savings) + spouse and 2 children's $3.75M on future growth (~$1.0M future tax savings).
Estate Freeze Defers ~$5.7M Tax
The estate freeze shifts future growth to the Family Trust. The remaining ~$5.7M tax (on $21.35M growth after LCGE) is deferred until the Trust sells, not paid at Kevin's death.
Time Has Value
Every year of delay costs millions in future taxes. These strategies work best when implemented early, before the problem compounds further.
Review Your Structure Today
If you're building a business and accumulating investments in the same corporation, you may be facing the same compounding tax bomb. The solution requires coordination with your tax lawyer, CPA, and estate planning professionals.
Continue the Series
Important Disclosure
This case study is illustrative only and not a substitute for professional advice. All client names and specific identifying details have been changed to protect confidentiality. This is an illustrative example of process and approach, not a guarantee of outcomes.
Assumptions: This case study assumes:
- OpCo EBITDA grows at 15% annually for 10 years, then remains flat
- Investment portfolio grows at 10% annually (50% of growth realized each year, 50% unrealized)
- Annual $200k capital additions increase adjusted cost basis
- $200,000 per year in after-tax profits are invested
- Tax rates remain constant (QC personal tax ~53.3%, capital gains inclusion rate 50%)
- Business valuation uses a 9x EBITDA multiple (appropriate for high-growth industries with stable long-term earnings)
- Investment portfolio valued at fair market value
Every situation is unique. Tax outcomes, business valuations, investment performance, and estate planning results depend on many factors including age, corporate structure, tax rules, investment returns, business performance, and family circumstances. What worked in this case may not be appropriate for your circumstances.
These strategies require professional coordination. Purification, estate freezes, and trust structures involve complex tax and legal considerations. Always work with your tax lawyer, CPA, and estate planning professionals to understand how these concepts apply to your situation. Do not implement these strategies without professional guidance.